<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Load Based Teaming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frankdenneman.nl/2010/07/load-based-teaming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frankdenneman.nl/2010/07/load-based-teaming/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:27:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vSphere 5, thoughts after 4 months of deployment (2/3) &#124; &#124; reduktor.netreduktor.net</title>
		<link>http://frankdenneman.nl/2010/07/load-based-teaming/comment-page-1/#comment-5095</link>
		<dc:creator>vSphere 5, thoughts after 4 months of deployment (2/3) &#124; &#124; reduktor.netreduktor.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 05:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankdenneman.nl/?p=1055#comment-5095</guid>
		<description>[...] is to utilise the new &#8220;Route based on physical NIC load&#8221;, explained clearly over at Frank Denneman&#8217;s rather useful blog (another article to read is the one titled IP Hash versus LBT, also by Frank Denneman).  Once [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is to utilise the new &#8220;Route based on physical NIC load&#8221;, explained clearly over at Frank Denneman&#8217;s rather useful blog (another article to read is the one titled IP Hash versus LBT, also by Frank Denneman).  Once [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VCAP-DCA Objective 2.3 &#8211; Deploy and Maintain Scalable Virtual Networking &#124; The world of Marc O&#039;Polo &#8211; Blog</title>
		<link>http://frankdenneman.nl/2010/07/load-based-teaming/comment-page-1/#comment-4222</link>
		<dc:creator>VCAP-DCA Objective 2.3 &#8211; Deploy and Maintain Scalable Virtual Networking &#124; The world of Marc O&#039;Polo &#8211; Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankdenneman.nl/?p=1055#comment-4222</guid>
		<description>[...] Source Frank Denneman blog: http://frankdenneman.nl/2010/07/load-based-teaming/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source Frank Denneman blog: <a href="http://frankdenneman.nl/2010/07/load-based-teaming/" rel="nofollow">http://frankdenneman.nl/2010/07/load-based-teaming/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Howarth</title>
		<link>http://frankdenneman.nl/2010/07/load-based-teaming/comment-page-1/#comment-4196</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Howarth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 15:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankdenneman.nl/?p=1055#comment-4196</guid>
		<description>Dan,

a Layer 2 domain effectively relates to a VLAN,  if that VLAN spans switches then the domain spans those switches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,</p>
<p>a Layer 2 domain effectively relates to a VLAN,  if that VLAN spans switches then the domain spans those switches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://frankdenneman.nl/2010/07/load-based-teaming/comment-page-1/#comment-4184</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 18:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankdenneman.nl/?p=1055#comment-4184</guid>
		<description>&quot;all switches must be a part of the same layer 2 domain&quot;

This means that you cannot connect the ESX nics to separated switches, only switches that are stacked?

Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;all switches must be a part of the same layer 2 domain&#8221;</p>
<p>This means that you cannot connect the ESX nics to separated switches, only switches that are stacked?</p>
<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Miller</title>
		<link>http://frankdenneman.nl/2010/07/load-based-teaming/comment-page-1/#comment-776</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 19:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankdenneman.nl/?p=1055#comment-776</guid>
		<description>From a consulting perspective, I&#039;m both extremely happy to see this...and also extremely annoyed.

Simply put, much of my customer base (I work in the channel) does not have or need Enterprise Plus (nor can they necessarily justify affording it when we&#039;re up against Hyper-V).

So....I&#039;m really happy to see this and plan to work it into my best practices setup....for maybe 20% of my customers that have Enterprise Plus. :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a consulting perspective, I&#8217;m both extremely happy to see this&#8230;and also extremely annoyed.</p>
<p>Simply put, much of my customer base (I work in the channel) does not have or need Enterprise Plus (nor can they necessarily justify affording it when we&#8217;re up against Hyper-V).</p>
<p>So&#8230;.I&#8217;m really happy to see this and plan to work it into my best practices setup&#8230;.for maybe 20% of my customers that have Enterprise Plus. <img src='http://frankdenneman.nl/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NiTRo</title>
		<link>http://frankdenneman.nl/2010/07/load-based-teaming/comment-page-1/#comment-768</link>
		<dc:creator>NiTRo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 22:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankdenneman.nl/?p=1055#comment-768</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot Frank, it looks like you read my mind because i was thinking since few days to build a setup of some vESXi to test the efficiency of this new feature. Now i know how it works :) I&#039;ll give you the results if you&#039;re interested.

BTW, did you heard about some plans to implement that in standard vSwitches ?

Thanks again for sharing your knowledge !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot Frank, it looks like you read my mind because i was thinking since few days to build a setup of some vESXi to test the efficiency of this new feature. Now i know how it works <img src='http://frankdenneman.nl/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I&#8217;ll give you the results if you&#8217;re interested.</p>
<p>BTW, did you heard about some plans to implement that in standard vSwitches ?</p>
<p>Thanks again for sharing your knowledge !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LucD</title>
		<link>http://frankdenneman.nl/2010/07/load-based-teaming/comment-page-1/#comment-767</link>
		<dc:creator>LucD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankdenneman.nl/?p=1055#comment-767</guid>
		<description>Hi Frank, great post as always.
I have updated my dvSwitch post, see http://www.lucd.info/2009/10/12/dvswitch-scripting-part-2-dvportgroup/.
The script now supports teaming, including load based teaming as described in your post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Frank, great post as always.<br />
I have updated my dvSwitch post, see <a href="http://www.lucd.info/2009/10/12/dvswitch-scripting-part-2-dvportgroup/" rel="nofollow">http://www.lucd.info/2009/10/12/dvswitch-scripting-part-2-dvportgroup/</a>.<br />
The script now supports teaming, including load based teaming as described in your post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob B</title>
		<link>http://frankdenneman.nl/2010/07/load-based-teaming/comment-page-1/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankdenneman.nl/?p=1055#comment-766</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the response Frank
Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the response Frank<br />
Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vSphere 4.1 and its new CPU scheduler &#124; P2V It!</title>
		<link>http://frankdenneman.nl/2010/07/load-based-teaming/comment-page-1/#comment-757</link>
		<dc:creator>vSphere 4.1 and its new CPU scheduler &#124; P2V It!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankdenneman.nl/?p=1055#comment-757</guid>
		<description>[...] Denneman:&#160;Load Based Teaming&#65279;,&#160;DPM scheduled tasks&#65279; and&#160;VM to Hosts affinity [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Denneman:&nbsp;Load Based Teaming&#65279;,&nbsp;DPM scheduled tasks&#65279; and&nbsp;VM to Hosts affinity [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thevirtualnews.com</title>
		<link>http://frankdenneman.nl/2010/07/load-based-teaming/comment-page-1/#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>thevirtualnews.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 04:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankdenneman.nl/?p=1055#comment-752</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Load Based Teaming &#124; frankdenneman.nl...&lt;/strong&gt;

In vSphere 4.1 a new network Load Based Teaming (LBT) algorithm is available on the distributed virtual switch dvPort groups. The option “Route based on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Load Based Teaming | frankdenneman.nl&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>In vSphere 4.1 a new network Load Based Teaming (LBT) algorithm is available on the distributed virtual switch dvPort groups. The option “Route based on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: frankdenneman.nl @ 2012-02-07 21:03:31 -->
