• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

frankdenneman.nl

  • AI/ML
  • NUMA
  • About Me
  • Privacy Policy

2 days left to vote

September 19, 2010 by frankdenneman

Eric Siebert owner of vSphere-land.com started the second round of the bi-annual top 25 VMware virtualization blogs voting. The last voting was back in January and this is your chance to vote for your favorite virtualization bloggers and help determining the top 25 blogs of 2010.
This year my blog got nominated for the first time and entered the top 25 (no. 14) and I hope to stay in the top 25 after this voting round. My articles tend to focus primarily on resource management and cover topics such as DRS, CPU and memory scheduler to help you make an informed decision when designing or managing a virtual infrastructure. As noble as this may sound I know that these kinds of topics are not mainstream and I can understand that not everybody is interested to read about these topics week in week out.
Fortunately I’ve managed to get a blog post listed in the Top 5 Planet V12n blog post list at least once every month and referred on a regular basis by sites like Yellow-bricks.com (Duncan Epping), Scott Lowe, NTpro.nl (Eric Sloof) and Chad Sakac and of course many others. So it seems I’m doing something right.
This is my list of top 10 articles I’ve created this year:

  • ESX 4.1 NUMA scheduling
  • vCloud Director Architecture
  • VM to Host Affinity rule
  • Memory Reclaimation, when and how?
  • Reservations and CPU scheduling
  • Resource pools and memory reservations
  • ESX ALUA, TPGS and HP CA
  • Removing an orphaned Nexus DVS
  • Impact of Host local swap on HA and DRS
  • Sizing VMs and NUMA nodes


Closing remarks

This year I’ve got to personally know a lot of bloggers and one thing that amazed me was the time and effort that each of these bloggers put into their work in their spare time. Please take a couple of minutes to vote at vSphere-land whether it’s for me or any of the other bloggers listed and reward them for their hard work.

Filed Under: VMware Tagged With: Top 25 Bloggers, VMware

vCloud Director Architecture

September 8, 2010 by frankdenneman

A vCloud infrastructure consists of several components. Many of you have deployed, managed, installed or designed vSphere environments. The vCloud Director architecture introduces a new and additional layer on top of the vSphere environment.
vCloud Director Architecture diagram
I have created a diagram which depicts architecture mainly to be used by service providers. Service providers are likely to use an internal cloud for their own application and IT department operations and an external cloud environment for their service delivery.
The purpose of this diagram is to create a clear overview of the new environment and showing a relational overview of all the components. In essence, which component connects with which other components?
The environment consists of a management cluster, an internal resource group and an external resource group. Building blocks (VMware vSphere, SAN and networking) within a vCD environment are often referred to as “resource groups”.
To run a VMware vCloud environment, the minimum components to run are:
• VMware vCloud Director (vCD)
• VMware vShield Manager
• VMware Chargeback
• VMware vCenter (supporting the Resource groups)
• vSphere infrastructure
• Supporting infrastructure elements (Networking, SAN)
The management cluster contains all the vCD components, such as the vCenters and Update managers managing the resource groups, the vCD cells and Chargeback clusters. Due to the Oracle Database requirement, a physical Oracle cluster is recommended, as RAC clustering is not supported on VMware vSphere. No vCD is used to manage the management cluster, management is done by a dedicated vCenter.
Within a resource pod a separate cluster is created for each pVCD to enable the service provider to deliver the different service levels. Duncan wrote a great introduction to VCD recently. http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2010/08/31/vmware-vcloud-director-vcd/.
This diagram shows two additional vCenters, one for the internal resource pod and one for the external resource pod. It is advised to isolate internal IT resources from customer IT resources. Managing and deploying internal IT services and external IT services such as customers VM from one vCD can become obscure and complex. A single vCenter is used for both pVCDs as it expected that customer will deploy virtual machines in different service level offerings. By using one vCenter a single Distributed Virtual Switch can be used, spanning both clusters\service offerings.
To rehash, this is a abstract high level diagram intended to show the involved elements of a vCloud environment and to show the relation or connections all the components.

Filed Under: VMware Tagged With: diagram, vCD, vCloud architecture

VMware tools disk timeout value Linux GOS

April 28, 2010 by frankdenneman

After I posted the “VMtools increases TimeOutValue article” I received a lot of questions if the VMware Tools automatically adjust the timeout value for Linux machines as well.
Well, VMware Tools of versions ESX 3.5 Update 5 and ESX 4.0 install a udev rule file on Linux operating systems with kernel version equal or greater then 2.6.13. This rule file changes the default timeout value of VMware virtual disks to 180 seconds. This helps the guest operating system to better survive a SAN failure and keep the linux system disk from becoming read only.
Because of the requirement of updates related to udev featured in the 2.6.13 kernel, the SCSI timeout value in other Linux kernels is not touched by the installation of VMware tools and the default value remains active.
The two major Linux Kernel version each have a different timeout value:
Linux 2.4 – 60 seconds
Linux 2.6 – 30 seconds
You can set the timeout value manually listed in /sys/block/disk/device/timeout. The problem is the distinction VMtools make between certain Linux Kernels, if you do not know this caveat you might end up with an Linux environment which is not configured exactly the same. This can lead to different behaviour during a SAN outage. Standardization is key when managing virtual infrastructure environments and a uniform environment eases troubleshooting
A while ago Jason wrote an excellent article about the values and benefit of increasing the guest os timeout

Filed Under: VMware Tagged With: disk timeout, Linux, VMware, VMware Tools

Top 25 Virtualization Bloggers

January 21, 2010 by frankdenneman

This week Eric Siebert processed all the votes and published this year’s Top 25 VMware/Virtualization Blogger list. Over 700 people voted, each casting 10 votes. I can only imagine the work involved that is put in to producing this list, so a big thank you goes out to Eric for voluntary organizing this! Awesome! This year a lot of new names entered the top 25 including my blog. I never ever expected to see my name published in the top 25. I’m truly honored to make it to the list, let alone be voted number #14 so I would like to thank everyone for voting for me! I really appreciate it!
Congratulations to all other people mentioned in the list and I would like to congratulate Duncan Epping specifically for taking the number 1 place again this year. The top 25 as published by Eric Siebert on vSphere-land:

1 Yellow Bricks Duncan Epping
2 Virtual Geek Chad Sakac
3 blog.scottlowe.org Scott Lowe
4 ntpro.nl Eric Sloof
5 rtfm-ed.co.uk Mike Laverick
6 Boche.net Jason Boche
7 VM/etc Rich Brambley
8 gabesvirtualworld.com Gabrie van Zanten
9 virtualstorageguy Vaughn Stewart
10 virtu-al.net Alan Renouf
1 1 virtualization-pro Various
12 vcritical.com Eric Gray
13 vmwaretips.com Rick Scherer
14 frankdenneman.nl Frank Denneman
15 vmguy.com Dave Lawrence
16 planetvm.net Tom Howarth
17 The Slog Simon Long
18 vmguru.nl Various
19 Mike D’s Blog Mike DiPetrillo
20 Hypervizor.com Hany Michael
21 techhead.co.uk Simon Seagrave
22 vreference.com Forbes Guthrie
23 Pivot Point Scott Drummonds
24 TechnoDrone Maish Saidel-Keesing
25 chriswolf.com Chris Wolf

A new home
Being voted one of the top 25 bloggers, puts a lot of pressure on one. I hope to continue blogging articles people find interesting. And to make a good start, frankdenneman.wordpress.com moved to www.frankdenneman.nl.

Filed Under: VMware

VMware updates Timekeeping best practices

December 22, 2009 by frankdenneman

A couple of weeks ago I discovered that VMware updated its timekeeping best practices for Linux virtual machines. December 7th VMware published a new best practice of timekeeping in Windows VMs. (KB1318)
VMware now recommends to use either W32Time or NTP for all virtual machines. This a welcome statement from VMware ending the age old question while designing a Virtual Infrastructure; Do we use VMware tools time sync or do we use W32time? If we use VMware tools, how do we configure the Active Directory controller VMs?
VMware Tools can still be used and still function well enough for most non time sensitive application. VMware tools time sync is excellent in accelerating and catching up time if the time
that is visible to virtual machines (called apparent time) is going slowly, but W32time and NTP can do one thing that VMware tools time sync can’t, that’s slowing down time.
Page 15 of the (older) white paper: Timekeeping in VMware Virtual Machines
http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vmware_timekeeping.pdf explains the issue.

However, at this writing, VMware Tools clock synchronization has a serious limitation: it cannot correct the guest clock if it gets ahead of real time (except in the case of NetWare guest operating systems).

For more info about timekeeping best practices for Windows VMs, please check out KB article 1318 http://kb.vmware.com/kb/1318
It appears that VMware updated the Timekeeping best practices for Linux guests as well.
http://kb.vmware.com/kb/1006427 (9 december 2009)

Filed Under: VMware Tagged With: Time synchronization

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 25
  • Page 26
  • Page 27
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Go to Next Page »

Copyright © 2025 · SquareOne Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in